Powell Avoids Policy Talk, But Inflation Remarks Draw Interest
US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell delivered remarks at the George P. Shultz Memorial Lecture at Stanford’s Hoover Institution on December 1st. He deliberately avoided discussing current economic conditions or monetary policy, although his historical remarks carried implicit significance for current debates. Timing Raised Questions The timing of Powell’s appearance sparked considerable interest among market
US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell delivered remarks at the George P. Shultz Memorial Lecture at Stanford’s Hoover Institution on December 1st.
He deliberately avoided discussing current economic conditions or monetary policy, although his historical remarks carried implicit significance for current debates.
Timing Raised Questions
The timing of Powell’s appearance sparked considerable interest among market watchers. With the next FOMC meeting just nine days away and market expectations for rate cuts rising, many had hoped for signals about the Fed’s policy direction.
Additionally, speculation has intensified that President-elect Trump may announce his Fed chair pick within the month, with Kevin Hassett among the likely candidates. Powell’s term expires in May 2026.
However, Powell declared at the outset, “I will not address current economic conditions or monetary policy,” and focused on celebrating the legacy of the late George Shultz.
US Fed Chair Jerome Powell participated in George P. Shultz Memorial Lecture Series: Shultz And Economic Policy. Captured from YouTube.
While Powell avoided current policy discussions, his historical commentary on inflation carried implicit significance. Reflecting on the wage and price controls of the Nixon era, Powell emphasized the evolution of economic understanding:
“Our understanding of the economy is ever evolving… certain things that are sometimes accepted as conventional wisdom, people will look back in 50 years and think, what were they thinking?”
Powell’s remarks carried dual meaning. It was both humility—even the Fed can be wrong—and defense: today’s criticism may look different with hindsight.
Many analysts noted connections between his historical references and current monetary conditions. As the Fed concluded the period of quantitative tightening, it halts the Fed’s reduction of liquidity, potentially stabilizing conditions for banks, investment funds, and entities exposed to risk assets.
Price Stability Is “Settled”
Most notably, Powell affirmed the Fed’s mandate on price stability. “We understand now that the central bank is responsible for price stability,” he stated. “That issue is settled. It doesn’t mean it’s easy to do, but the issue is settled.”
This assertion of the Fed’s mandate comes at a particularly charged moment. The Trump administration has signaled interest in reshaping Fed leadership, as National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said, “Monetary policy has gotten very complicated… I think we’ve got to simplify things.”
Powell’s emphasis on central bank responsibility may carry a subtle message. The Fed’s independence remains a sensitive topic in Washington. Powell reinforced the Fed’s long-standing commitment to independence and data-driven decisions. These points suggest a desire for continuity, even amid political pressure.
Powell praised Shultz’s approach to policymaking, combining “strong principles and unshakable integrity with practical problem solving.” Powell also highlighted Shultz’s belief in market wisdom, noting, “He had a deep belief in the wisdom of markets.” Observers suggested this could reflect Powell’s own professional credos as he navigates his final months as Fed chair.
The Hoover Institution at Stanford-hosted event, moderated by Peter Robinson and featuring former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and economist Michael Boskin, honored Shultz’s contributions to economic policy spanning five decades.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Netflix’s co-CEO talked about the Warner Bros. agreement with Trump
Short the Prediction Market
Mean Reversion of the Super Cycle of Speculation

Timeless Insights on Investing from 1927: How Human Behavior Continues to Shape Market Outcomes
- McNeel’s 1927 treatise and Buffett’s strategies emphasize intrinsic value and emotional discipline, countering market volatility through long-term focus. - Behavioral finance validates their approach, showing emotional biases like panic selling distort valuations during crises, while disciplined investors capitalize on dislocations. - Compounding through retained earnings, exemplified by Berkshire Hathaway’s Apple investments, highlights patience’s role in outperforming reactive market timing. - Modern v

Vitalik Buterin's Promotion of ZK Technology and the Prospects for DeFi: An In-Depth Strategic Investment Review
- Vitalik Buterin is driving blockchain's ZK-DeFi convergence, prioritizing scalability and privacy as Ethereum's core upgrades. - His GKR protocol accelerates ZK verification tenfold, while hybrid ZK-FHE/TEE solutions enhance security for voting and governance. - ZK rollups now process 15,000-43,000 TPS, with institutions like Deutsche Bank adopting them for compliance and supply chain transparency. - The $7.59B ZKP market (22.1% CAGR) and $237B DeFi TVL highlight ZK's role in enabling institutional-grade

