ID -11.63% 24H Due to Sharp Volatility
- ID plunged 11.63% in 24 hours to $0.1609, following a 1355.82% 7-day surge but a 6063.73% annual decline. - Sharp volatility triggered stop-loss orders and profit-taking, with analysts warning of continued short-term turbulence. - Technical indicators show a bearish "death cross" and overbought divergence, with key support levels at $0.15 and $0.12 under scrutiny. - A backtesting strategy proposes long-position triggers after 10%+ drops, evaluating risk-adjusted returns through defined entry/exit rules.
On AUG 30 2025, ID dropped by 11.63% within 24 hours to reach $0.1609, marking a significant correction in a volatile market. Over the past 7 days, the asset surged by 1355.82%, while over a 30-day period, it climbed by 514.39%. However, over the past year, ID has declined by 6063.73%, highlighting the asset’s extreme price fluctuations and structural instability.
Market participants have closely monitored the behavior of ID over recent trading sessions, particularly its sharp one-day drop following a multi-week rally. The asset’s 24-hour decline appears to have triggered stop-loss orders and profit-taking from short-term traders, compounding downward momentum. Analysts project that further short-term volatility is likely as the market re-evaluates long-term fundamentals.
Technical indicators suggest the asset is currently in a bearish phase, with RSI and MACD signaling overbought conditions in the prior week and now showing sharp divergence. The 50-day moving average has crossed below the 200-day line, forming a bearish "death cross" pattern. Traders are closely watching whether ID can retest key support levels at $0.15 and $0.12, where additional sell pressure or stabilizing buy interest may emerge.
Backtest Hypothesis
A potential backtesting strategy for ID involves identifying and acting on sharp price declines. Given the recent 10% drop within a single trading session, it is reasonable to consider whether a long-position strategy triggered by such an event would yield a statistically meaningful return. A standard approach would involve opening a long position at the next day’s open following a 10% or greater decline.
To simulate this strategy, precise entry and exit rules must be defined. For example, entry could be triggered by a 10% drop from the previous close, with a fixed exit after five trading days or upon achieving a 5% profit. Position sizing can be equal-weighted or adjusted to reflect real-world capital constraints. Once these parameters are confirmed, the backtest can be executed, and results analyzed for risk-adjusted return metrics, such as Sharpe ratio, maximum drawdown, and win rate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Google executive makes millions of dollars overnight through insider trading
Insider addresses manipulated Google's algorithm by referencing prediction market odds.

Stablecoins in 2025: You Are in Dream of the Red Chamber, I Am in Journey to the West
But in the end, we may all arrive at the same destination through different paths.

XRP’s Extreme Fear Level Mirrors Past 22 % Rally

Critical Bitcoin Bear Market Signal: 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Buying Slows Dramatically