Analysts: Bitcoin should not be compared to the tulip mania.
analyst Eric Balchunas points out that Bitcoin should not be compared to the tulip bubble. Unlike tulips, which existed for only 3 years before collapsing, Bitcoin has existed for 17 years and has been able to recover to historical highs after 6-7 major hits. Although Bitcoin, like gold and artworks, is a non-productive asset, it also holds value.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The USE.com Presale Heats Up as Early Contributors Position for a High-Impact Exchange Launch
The Rapid Downturn of COAI: An In-Depth Analysis of Market Drivers and Effects on Investors
- COAI index plummeted 88% in 2025 due to governance failures, regulatory ambiguity, and systemic AI-driven risks. - C3.ai's leadership crisis and $116.8M loss triggered investor panic, while CLARITY Act's unclear regulations deepened uncertainty. - AI's role in synchronized market swings and fragmented oversight amplified COAI's collapse, exposing systemic vulnerabilities. - Behavioral biases like herd behavior accelerated sell-offs, underscoring the need for diversified portfolios and robust regulatory f
Crypto: 23,561 Billion SHIB Moved in 24H — Manipulation or Glitch?
Jupiter Lend Clarifies Earlier 'Zero Contagion' Statement Was Not Accurate
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More
